Perhaps your nanny should not be influenced by E-Tolls to drive the back roads

How will your driving habits change with the e-Tolling on the highways in Gauteng? Are you going to drive along the side roads more and is it the safe thing to do?

Driving on Rural roads versus Highways in the United States

This question with regards to the safety on secondary roads is not unique to South Africa – this has also been raised in the United States and specifically with regards to where others who look after our children have to make decisions with regards to their transportation!

We would like to quote from one such post discussing the driving by a Nanny of children on rural roads instead of Highways in the United States:

“When one of the responsibilities you’ll be charging your nanny with includes driving your children to and from various activities, it’s perfectly natural to be a bit nervous. After all, you’re entrusting incredibly precious cargo to the driving abilities of a relative stranger. For some parents, the best solution to the issue is the establishment of a rule that bans highway driving. When your nanny isn’t driving on the interstate or major highways with your children, the speed at which she travels will be restricted and she may encounter less traffic. Before you decide to forbid highway cruises when your kids are in the car, however, there are a few things that you might want to consider.

Safety By the Numbers

According the United States Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration, the interstate system was established in order to help improve the safety of travel in the United States and to reduce the fatality rate of car accidents. While the sudden lane changes and higher rate of speed can make the highway seem like a more dangerous place, the truth is that this just isn’t always the case. From a statistical standpoint, interstates are generally safer than other types of roads. Paired with the fact that cars on the highway are traveling in the same direction at roughly the same velocity. On rural roads and back roads, this is not usually the case. When cross-traffic, cyclists, pedestrians and motorcycles are factored into the equation, the risk for impact actually rises.

Statistics Versus Severity

If you’re looking at the issue of back road driving versus interstate or highway transportation while your nanny’s at the wheel and the kids are in tow, statistics aren’t always the most comforting reassurance of your children’s safety. It’s also important to realize that while the statistical likelihood of your children being involved in an accident is actually lower if they’re on the highway, crashes that do happen on the interstate are often more severe than their counterparts on back roads with lower speed limits. Still, Federal transportation data collected in 2007 showed that 0.54 people were killed for every 100 million vehicle miles driven on urban interstates. Those numbers jump to 0.92 for every 100 million vehicle miles on urban highways and arterials, up to 1.32 fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles on local urban streets.

Rural Versus Urban Driving

If you live in a rural or semi-rural area and your nanny will be driving your children to and from events in neighboring towns or cities, the risk of forcing her to take only rural roads jumps dramatically. The two-lane highway may have a posted speed limit of only fifty-five with fewer drivers that the interstate that runs into the same town, but the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s data shows that the risk of fatal crashes on rural roads is up to 2.5 times higher per mile traveled than on urban highways and interstates.

Ensuring Your Kids’ Travel Safety

The circumstances that surround your decision to either ban or allow highway driving are as unique as your family itself. The area in which you live, the distance your nanny will have to travel and the frequency of trips with your kids in the car are all factors that will affect the statistical safety of your kids while they’re riding with Nanny. The one thing that’s universally true when it comes to making kids safer in a vehicle with a childcare provider is that it’s imperative to run a full background check on your nanny as part of a pre-employment screening process.

That background check should definitely include, but not be limited to, her driving record. If your dream nanny interviews well and her driving record is questionable, you may want to rethink your decision regarding the extension of an employment offer or rework the schedule so that driving is never one of her responsibilities. Make sure that any vehicle a nanny drives with your kids inside is properly fitted with the appropriate seats and restraints, and that the children understand the importance of behaving in a manner that’s not distracting to the driver. Remember, there’s no such thing as being to cautious when it comes to protecting your kids on the road.”

Driving in South Africa

Even though driving in South Africa might require significant other considerations – it remains as important to focus not only on road conditions and vehicle fitness, but also to pay close attention to possible criminality and safety concerns on the rural roads where they may be less traffic enforcement.

The road safety advice and suggestions are also as important as is the need for effective driver behaviour measurement. Whether you decide that it is best to reduce travel on highways or whether you decide it is best to stick to the highways – you may like to consider the benefits of effective control over whoever drives your kids around!

We would like to quote from the Road Safety Blog on how vehicle tracking and insurance telematics can assist in ensuring that the nanny driving your kid is doing so safety!

In the post titled Insurance Telematics Delivers Scientific and Safer Driving we find the following:

Is Insurance Telematics capable of changing driver behaviour towards enhanced road safety?

Much of our discussions on insurance telematics tend to focus on the ability of the measurement of driving behaviour to make car insurance premiums affordable.

For the purposes of this post we would however like to narrow the scope of our focus to the simple question – can it make the roads safer?

In doing so I would, with the permission from Discovery Insure, like to share a very specific real time example and also focus on the communication between the insurer and the client.

What is reported to the client?

The data provided by the DQ Track system developed by Ctrack on the driving behaviour of the client is communicated to the client on a monthly basis allowing the client some very important insights on how he has been driving.

Example:

Insurance telematics and the ability to change driving behaviour

The data collected by Discovery Insure has provided a very pleasing indication on how on a monthly basis drivers have been able to change driving behaviour and reduced aspects of driving such as harsh acceleration, harsh braking and speeding!

Example:

A very specific example proved how this data allowed a parent to intervene after noticing several high risk driving activities by an au pair. This was communicated to the au pair and it can be clearly seen how the driving behaviour has changed and the number of dangerous driving activities reduced!

Conclusion:

Scientific measurement of driving behaviour through insurance telematics and black boxes is not only an important tool to deliver accurate data for the measurement of car insurance premiums. It can and should be used to change driver behaviour! The insurance industry can through technology and communication with clients promote the right health and lifestyle choices.

Car insurers such as Discovery Insure are now able to also impact on the lifestyle choice of safe driving thereby making a significant contribution towards road safety!

Pin It on Pinterest